Now, my extended family is quite intelligent, scary smart
really. A couple of PhDs, Masters
degrees, and Bachelor degrees like they’re napkins at McDonald’s; but it felt
like they were defaulting to me to provide a clear explanation as to why it won
because I was the one to study art at uni.
The big question was why did a painting that, from first impressions,
seems to be almost wholly abstract and “easy to paint” win over other works that
were astoundingly well-crafted, labour-intensive objects of beauty. It turns out that I was all too keen to
provide a possible insight (mainly because I’m a bit of a show-off...), but
what about those people who don’t have ready access to a smart arse like myself? Do they feel inadequate or not worthy to
offer up thoughts on artworks because they’re “not arty people”, even if they’re
actually very intelligent? I’d say yes,
they probably do feel unable to voice an opinion or comment, but it’s not
really a feeling of inadequacy, it’s more a feeling of being illiterate.
Art is like a language. I
don’t mean that there’s an agreed list of symbols that artists use to spell out
specific messages (like if you paint a skull you mean death, or if you paint
a squirrel on the northern side of an oak tree you want to marry your first
cousin), but that an artwork can give you clues to what the artist may have
been on about when they were making it.
These clues may not lead you exactly to what the artist intended to say with
their artwork, but it does let you have a good discussion about the artwork or
the artist or just stuff in general.
Surely that’s one of the main objectives of art, considering that most
people aren’t going to drop $50000 to brighten up their lounge room wall.
But back to this awful unentitled or illiterate feeling. I believe that the reason people feel like
this in a gallery situation is that they think you need to have expert
knowledge and a ridiculous vocabulary to speak about art to other people, and
that you need to be able to explain the artwork in its entirety. Wrong.
It’s true, there is an “art world” full of people who can talk the talk,
write the essays, and pour on the attitude, but none of that is really
necessary to have a very intelligent, in-depth conversation about an artwork,
its message, and its impact on the people looking at it. It certainly helps to have a healthy
understanding of art-making and art history, but in my mind, it’s the obvious
comments about an artwork that say the most, and lead you to the best
understandings.
When I look at an artwork, I like to go with my very first thought
as my first clue in sorting out what I think the artwork is saying. If it gives you a certain feeling, think
about why it makes you feel like that, and then maybe why the artist wants you
feel that way. If it’s just a beautiful
artwork, why do you think so? It can be
even simpler than that though. Sometimes
you think something like, “Bloody hell, that’s a lot of red paint!”, so why did
the artist use so much? Having a kid
with you can be pretty handy to start the ball rolling. The first thing to come out of my son’s mouth
when he saw the winning Gabori painting was, “That’s big!” And you know, he was right, it’s
massive. But that leads you to think
about why the painting needed to be so big, why wasn’t it smaller. It’d be easier to move around, look after,
and install if it was half the size... why so big? Well it seems to me that a huge, imposing
painting is telling a story of a huge imposing landscape. The painting seems to wrap around you,
filling your entire field of vision.
Then you start thinking about the wild colours and how they’re drilling
into you as you stand there. It makes
you feel small, and that you’re standing before something that demands your
respect. I can only imagine that Bentinck Island does the same, and if your entire
culture and heritage is connected with the land, that’s a very humbling
experience indeed. Well done, my boy! Spotting that the painting is gigantic wasn’t
rocket science, but it started a great story!
The simple observations that we all make are the best way to
create a dialogue with an artwork. Dialogue
is a bit of a wanky way of describing the process, but it does tend to be the
best word for it. It irritates me when I
hear people saying things like, “I think the artist is saying that ...” or “This
artwork means ...” Three things are happening here: firstly, they’re assuming
that they fully understand the artist’s intention with the artwork; secondly, they’re
reducing the impact of an artwork to a single sentence or comment; and finally,
they sound like a tosser. We shouldn’t
try to sum up an artwork in an instant, it kinda seems a bit disrespectful to
the artist. It really is like a
conversation between the artwork and the viewers, you figure things out as you
go along, adjust what you thought before, and maybe come to a conclusion or at
best an easy place to end the chat. Do
you have to have the whole thing figured out? Not at all. Some artworks will remain a mystery to you,
while others seem straightforward.
The idea that art can only be talked about by artists and critics
is stupid. Let’s head out to a gallery,
say some obvious stuff, and have a great time!
[1] Art Almanac. 2012. Sally Gabori wins The Gold Award.
[ONLINE] Available at: http://www.art-almanac.com.au/2012/06/sally-gabori-wins-the-gold-award/. [Accessed 08 July 12].
Couldn't agree more! Went to the Uffizi gallery a few years back and, even with a sound knowledge of art, the subject matter was predominantly religious... now, I don't think I am shocking too many people when I say that I spend my Sunday morning praising the God of Shut-eye .... but it took me a bit to get over it and just start looking. And then noticing the same setting (ie Madonna and child) but how differently each artist chose to paint Madonna....
ReplyDeleteMy favourite was a baby the had the face of a 50 year old man and guns like beef-cake.
Comment over.
ps - art is cool peeps.
Damnit where's the "like" button when you need it!?
ReplyDeleteI concur. Art is amazing and totally worth talking about. Talking of I really should take my whippersnapper to see some art.....
Lizzie
Agreed! I take my kids to Art galleries every month or so. It is amazing what they see, from the blindingly obvious to the intricate details. They are great with the abstract painting cause they see it from a totally different perspective (or they are just closer to the ground) :)
ReplyDelete